Call (0115) 931 51 71 to talk to us about your situation
Barratts Legal
  • Twitter
  • Mail
  • Facebook
  • Welcome
  • Why Choose Us?
    • Who We Are
    • Our Approach
    • Our Team
    • Case Studies
    • News
    • FAQs
  • Clinical Negligence
    • Clinical Negligence Team
    • Case Studies
      • Birth injuries Case Studies
      • Brain Injury Case Studies
      • Misdiagnosis and Missed Diagnosis Case Studies
      • Surgical and Orthopaedic Errors Case Studies
      • DVT and Vascular Case Studies
    • Related News
    • Related Links
    • Birth Injuries
    • Spinal Injuries
    • Diagnosis Errors
    • Inquests
    • Funding Your Claim
  • Personal Injury
    • Personal Injury Team
    • Case studies
      • Spinal Injuries Case Studies
      • Brain Injury Case Studies
      • Road Traffic Accident Injury Case Studies
      • Workplace Injuries Case Studies
      • Industrial Disease Case Studies
      • Orthopaedic Injuries Case Studies
      • Mental Health Case Studies
    • Related News
    • Related Links
    • Head Injury
    • Subtle Brain Injury
    • Spinal Injuries
    • Inquests
    • Funding Your Claim
  • Criminal Injury Compensation
    • Criminal Injury Compensation Team
    • How we can help
    • Case studies
    • Spinal Injuries
    • Head Injury
    • Subtle Brain Injury
    • Funding
    • Inquests
  • Court of Protection
    • Court of Protection Team
    • The Work of a Deputy
    • Case Studies
    • Funding
  • Fatal Claims & Inquests
    • Inquests Team
    • The Inquest Process
    • Case Studies
      • Inquests Case Studies
      • Fatal Claims Case Studies
    • Funding
  • Contact
  • Menu Menu
Legal advice

Pulmonary Embolism – why you need to act quickly.

January 7, 2022/in Clinical Negligence News, Frontpage News, Inquest News, News

In 2018  Paul* contacted Alison Brooks to investigate a claim following the death of his wife, Mary*, in December 2017. She was only 64 years old and had died because of an undiagnosed Pulmonary Embolism (“PE”). This is when a blood clot develops in a pulmonary artery, often when the clot has started as a DVT in the leg. It is easily treatable because anti coagulants are given which break down the blood clot.

Paul knew about Legal 500, an independent legal guide which recommends lawyers in the UK , who are experts. Paul contacted Barratts Solicitors, because we are ranked in the top tier for clinical negligence claims, and asked Alison to help him investigate the death of his wife. He knew that he needed someone with experience to help, as the GP involved in Mary’s care, had denied that he had done anything wrong.

The Facts

In October 2017, Mary had undergone foot surgery and was recovering from the operation but, on 1st December, she began to feel breathless. Paul called the GP surgery and Mary was seen by a doctor who carried out some tests. Despite noting that PE was a possibility, he decided that Mary probably had bronchitis, a condition she had previously suffered from, and prescribed antibiotics.

Mary continued to feel unwell but believed she would soon feel better with the antibiotics. Tragically, in the early hours of 3rd December, Mary collapsed from a huge Pulmonary Embolism. Paul was trained in First Aid and tried to resuscitate his wife, but it was too late, and nothing could be done to save Mary.

The Claim

Paul wanted to ensure that the GP would not make the same mistake again, but the GP did not accept that his assessment of Mary had been negligent. Alison recognised that Paul was also suffering because of the traumatic circumstances of Mary’s death and might be able to claim compensation for his psychiatric illness. This is called a “secondary victim” award and can be hard to prove in medical cases because of restrictions in the law, which limit who can make a claim.

Paul was also suffering financially as he had his own health problems and relied on Mary to look after him. A claim for the support, that Mary would have provided to Paul, was made, as well as an award for her pain and suffering and funeral costs. When someone dies, the Government also sets a fixed amount for bereavement damages. This was £12,890 under the Fatal Accidents Act 1976 for deaths before 1 May 2020.

The Defence

A claim was issued against the GP who saw Mary on 1st December. We argued that the Defendant:

  • Should have carried our further tests for PE, at home or in hospital – the Wells score was developed by NICE (the National Institute for Clinical Excellence) and any result over 4 means a PE is likely; Mary’s score was 4.5.
  • Failed to properly inform Mary and her husband that Pulmonary Embolism was more likely than a chest infection and was potentially fatal if left untreated.
  • Did not follow up with Mary and falsely reassured her by prescribing antibiotics.

The Defendant argued that he did not refer Mary to hospital because she had refused to go in for treatment. A small note in the GP records stated:

Plan; offered admission for PE -patient declined.

The Defendant tried to rely on this entry, but we believed that a Court would not have accepted this defence because:

  • Mary had not refused medical treatment before and it would have been irrational for her to refuse admission to hospital, for a potentially fatal condition, if properly informed.
  • Paul was present during the examination, and the ambulance records showed that he also believed Mary just had a chest infection.
  • A GP with a patient refusing life threatening treatment would have made a very full note to explain the patient’s decision but the Defendant’s note was sparse.
  • If the Defendant was correct, Mary could still have been treated in the Community without going to hospital but the GP did nothing.

The Defence agreed that Mary would have survived if admitted to hospital any time on 1st December. This meant the case would succeed if we could show the GP had not provided a reasonable standard of care.

The GP continued to defend the case but we proposed a settlement meeting in 2021 and were able to settle the case with very little deduction for the risk of losing the case at Trial. This indicated that the Defendant’s advisers probably took a similar view to us about the case.

This has been a very difficult few years for Paul. He will never forget Mary; they were married for 18 years. Paul was disappointed that the GP never admitted any fault for Mary’s death, but he has recovered from his own psychiatric illness and has a new partner. Paul agreed to share this story as he wanted to highlight the risks of DVTs and Pulmonary Embolisms for others, in the hope that someone else recognises the signs and can be treated before it is too late.

*Please note that the clients’ names have been anonymised.

Share this entry
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share by Mail

News

  • Work Begins on new premises for Footprints Conductive Education CentreNovember 4, 2024 - 5:51 pm
  • Number 1 in a star
    Top Personal Injury and Clinical Negligence LawyersOctober 18, 2023 - 6:01 pm
  • Disabled boy in a wheelchair on the beach
    Makaton At ChristmasDecember 23, 2022 - 3:15 pm
  • charity help graphic
    Help for Charities at ChristmasDecember 8, 2022 - 9:55 am
  • Breaking news
    Top Band For Clinical Negligence and Personal InjuryOctober 7, 2022 - 1:27 pm
  • Julie with hand knitted bunnies and homemade biscuits
    Thank YouApril 28, 2022 - 3:02 pm
  • Legal advice
    Pulmonary Embolism – why you need to act quickly.January 7, 2022 - 10:56 am
  • Straight road with future dates
    Thirty Years And Continuing….December 15, 2021 - 11:07 pm
  • Spinal injury or pain
    Mental Health After Spinal Cord InjuryDecember 7, 2021 - 11:38 am
  • Guidance, Assistance, Support signpost
    Charities at ChristmasNovember 30, 2021 - 3:53 pm
  • Number 1 in a star
    Top For Clinical Negligence and Personal InjuryOctober 29, 2021 - 1:43 pm
  • Legal 500 top tier 2021
    CELEBRATING BARRATTS REVIEW BY LEGAL 500October 1, 2021 - 12:55 pm
  • Quality
    Promotions at BarrattsSeptember 23, 2021 - 12:24 pm
  • Disabled boy in a wheelchair on the beach
    NHS EARLY NOTIFICATION SCHEME FOR BIRTH INJURIESJuly 22, 2021 - 6:17 pm
  • Barratts solicitors news
    “Devastating Evidence” From Families at InquestsMay 27, 2021 - 2:38 pm
  • Wheelchair rugby
    Spinal Cord Injury Awareness Day is Today!May 21, 2021 - 1:22 pm
  • Disabled boy in a wheelchair on the beach
    Nottingham Maternity Services “Inadequate”December 9, 2020 - 7:51 pm
  • Girl living with spinal cord injury needs a wheelchair in a car
    Living With Spinal Cord InjuryNovember 18, 2020 - 6:33 pm
  • Nottingham Coroner's Court
    Missed Chances To Save Diabetic PatientNovember 12, 2020 - 5:08 pm
  • Consistency
    Top Tier for Personal Injury Litigation in NottinghamshireOctober 29, 2020 - 12:43 pm
AvMA accredited
SIA member
Head Injury Solicitor
Legal 500 leading firm
AVMA Panel
Chambers top ranked firm
Clinical Negligence Accreditation
Brain injury group
APIL accredited practice

Barratts

Click the below links for details of:
Legal Notices
Terms of Business
Interest Policy
Cookie Policy
Complaints Policy

Barratt Goff & Tomlinson Limited, trading as Barratts Solicitors, are authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority
No. 524015
Copyright Barratt Goff & Tomlinson Limited 2017

Opening Hours

Mo-Th: 9:00-17:00
Fr: 9.00-16.00

Out of hours appointments are also available

mail@barratts.legal

Tel: 0115 931 5171

© Barratts Solicitors
  • Twitter
  • Mail
  • Facebook
Thirty Years And Continuing….Straight road with future datesJulie with hand knitted bunnies and homemade biscuitsThank You
Scroll to top