Claim for Clinical Negligence after Rose’s Inquest
Rose passed away in April 2009 and her family were unhappy with the treatment she had received. We were instructed by her Daughter and Son to investigate this treatment provided by the hospital. We then represented the family at the Inquest.Rose’s daughter and son, Kath and Alan, contacted Barratts medical negligence team because they were concerned about her treatment. They instructed our solicitors and asked us to investigate the treatment the Defendant Trust had provided.
Rose had attended hospital on 13 April 2009 complaining of violent stomach pains and nausea. The hospital admitted her at around 6pm and staff diagnosed Rose with constipation. They transferred her to a ward for observation. Rose’s condition had deteriorated significantly by the morning of the 14 April. She was transferred as an emergency to another hospital within the same Trust, arriving at 3pm.
Rose was noted to have deteriorated further. Her legs had a mottled appearance and were cold to touch. Staff could not feel any of Rose’s peripheral pulses. At 4:30pm Rose suffered a heart attack and although she was stabilised, she was considered too unstable for surgery. Sadly, Rose passed away shortly afterwards. The cause of death was large bowel obstruction and diverticular stricture of sigmoid colon.
An Inquest confirmed that Rose had received substandard treatment. However, the Coroner concluded that this did not affect the outcome. The Court’s view was that Rose would have died, regardless of the standard of treatment she received. Kath and Alan were not satisfied with this explanation which is why they instructed us to represent them and to investigate a claim in negligence.
Evidence for the claim
We obtained supportive evidence from a General Surgeon which looked at Rose’s case more fully. This evidence confirmed that the treatment provided in April 2009 was negligent. It also confirmed that treatment Rose received from the same Trust 6 months previously was also negligent. Rose had been referred to hospital in November 2008. At that time she was complaining of lower abdominal pain and constipation. The hospital carried out some investigations but they negligently regarded the results as ‘normal’. Rose had been discharged in January 2009. The evidence confirmed that, had investigations been appropriately considered and followed through, then the events of April 2009 would not have happened. Further, had Rose undergone further investigation on her admission on 13 April and/or been treated urgently on the morning of the 14 April she would not have died.
The Defendants admitted liability and they made an offer of £30,000 which was rejected. Rose was only 64 years old at the time of her death and had been an active mother, partner and grandmother. She had spent most of her time helping her children, Kath and Alan and spending time with her grandchildren and partner, Glen. After we had gone through the inquest process, we helped Kath, Alan and Glen to claim damages for loss of financial dependency and loss of services. They eventually agreed to a settlement of £120,000.
Ed Hudson – Serious Injury Guide Plus
Ed Hudson sustained serious injuries, a C4 fracture of his spinal cord, in a road traffic accident in February 2018. Ed originally instructed another firm of solicitors
LIFETIME FINANCIAL SECURITY FOR CHILD WHO SUFFERED BRAIN INJURY AT BIRTH
Julie Hardy reports on a successful outcome for her client who was diagnosed with cerebral palsy: The Claim I acted for Max, who has cerebral palsy after his family asked me to see if there was a clinical negligence claim for him. I know what a difference compensation can make to a client with severe […]
Compensation after an attack on a healthcare worker by a psychiatric patient
Our clients’ story is especially poignant during the Coronavirus outbreak. It illustrates the risks taken every day by nursing and medical staff to help patients.
NHS Training is Improved after Inquest Rules Accidental Death
When Martin’s Mother died in hospital, we represented him at the Inquest into her death. As a result of the Inquest there have been significant changes to NHS procedures and training.
Compensation for Rosie after Medical Negligence at Birth
Rosie suffered from brain damage at birth. We proved that the medical team was negligent and we obtained a substantial settlement for Rosie. This has allowed her to live in an adapted property that is specific to her needs. It also funded additional private medical treatment.
Compensation for GP’s Negligence
When Harry’s father died he felt the GP had been negligent so he asked Barratts Solicitors for help. We gathered the medical evidence we needed to show this was the case. We succeeded in pursuing a claim for compensation for Harry because he was classed as a ‘dependent’ of the deceased.
Compensation for Infertility due to Poor Medical Treatment
Theresa had spent many years trying to get compensation for poor medical treatment leading to infertility. The hospital denied any wrongdoing and she felt frustrated. We listened and took time to understand Theresa’s situation then we followed up her case and recovered compensation for her.
Out of hours appointments are also available